A. READING Excerpt: RACE AT THEROCK:RACE CARDS,WHITEMYTHS,AND POSTRACIALAMERICA
ByJ. JeremyWisnewski
There are stereotypes
of blacks that go back at leasttwo hundred years: the sexual, animalistic
African, exoticseducer of white women. The philosopher and social
theoristFrantz Fanon(1925–1961)referstothisasthe“sexualmyth”surrounding black men. As Fanon puts it,
“The white manis convincedthattheNegroisabeast;ifitisnotthelengthofthepenis,thenitisthesexualpotencythatimpresseshim”—both of which,
Fanon insists, are mere racist clichés thatseparate whitesfromotherraces.1
MalcolmXclaimed,withsomejustification,thathewas reallysentencedtoalengthyprisonsentenceforsleeping with a white woman (not for burglary). The
judge of thecase couldn’tbearthethoughtofthe“sexualizedNegro”“having”a whitewoman…
“Racialism” defined by thecontemporaryphilosopherKwameAnthonyAppiah,lurks atthecoreofacontinuedmisunderstandingoftheproblemof race.Racialisminvolvesthebeliefthat
we could divide human beings into a small numberof groups,
called “races,” in such a way that themembers of these groups shared certain fundamental,heritable, physical,moral,intellectual,andculturalcharacteristicswithoneanotherthattheydidnotsharewithmembers of any otherrace.2
As Appiah goes on to argue, no such groups exist.Indeed, groupingraces“forbiologicalpurposes,yourclassificationwillcontainalmostasmuchhumangeneticvariationasthereisin the whole species.”3 The most we
can classify as a “race” isa group of partially reproductively isolated
people. AsAppiah points out, though, this means that “no
large social groupin America is a race.”4
Theproblemisthatweseemtobestuckthinkingthattheyare real.
This, as we’ve seen, can lead people to adopt, or evento be forced into, particular kinds ofidentities.
Once
the racial label is applied to people, ideasabout what it refers to, ideas that may be much
lessconsensualthantheapplicationofthelabel,cometohave theirsocialeffects.Buttheyhavenotonlysocialeffects butpsychologicalonesaswell;andtheyshapetheways peopleconceiveofthemselvesandtheirprojects.5
Behindourthinkingaboutrace,then,isakindofracialism—the view that race is essential to who
one is and what
onedoes.
There’s still a
lot of discrimination based on the false idea thatraces are essential to
who one is. So even being a certain wayright nowdoesn’talleviatetheinequalitythathasbeensustainedin oursocialinstitutions.Itlikewisedoesn’tmakeracialprejudicegoaway.
Thefactthatraceissociallyrealbutbiologicallyspurious makesissuesofracialequalityallthemoredifficult.Onthe one hand, we want to promote racial
equality. On theother, we want to deny that there is anything that
really counts asa race. The situation seems to require
something likedouble- talk:wewanttohaveraceanddoawaywithittoo.
Yet theideaofraceissociallyreal,andithasveryreal consequences.
If the ultimate goal is equality, we
don’tneed anybiologicalnotionofracetostriveforit.Whateverone’s social group happens to be, and however oneself-identifies orisidentifiedbyothers,thegoalisthesame:thatwehave equaltreatmentofthosewhohavehistoricallybeentreatedin ways
that fall far short of this. But what does equaltreatment require?
Thenotionofequalityshouldn’tbemisunderstood.It doesn’t
mean treating everyone in identical ways. Itmeans,rather,givingequalconsiderationtotheinterestsofeveryoneinvolved.Absolutelyequaltreatment—takentotheextreme— would involve giving the same
medication to everyone,evenwhen they didn’t need
it. It would involve forcingeveryoneto watch the same movies
at the same times, to eat thesamefoodswiththesamespices,tohaveromanticrelationshipswiththesamepeopleinthesameways.Inshort,itwouldturnadesiretoendoppressionintoanevenmoreoppressivesystem in which people were forced to be equivalent tooneanother.Equalitydemandsconsideringthedifferentinterestsof
people equally; it doesn’t mean demanding thateveryonehave
identicalinterests.
When we see that races aren’t biologically real, andthat thinkingofthemasrealleadstoinequality,weputourselves in a position to give up both racism and racialism.Thisdoesn’t mean we won’t use the word “racist” anymore,and it doesn’t mean that inequality will
just evaporate. Whatitdoes mean, though, is that we’ll be better able to see thecon-sequences of our assumptions about race when
they bubble up—andthiswillgiveusanoccasiontoacttorectifywhatever injusticesweencounter.
Questions
1. According
to KwameAnthonyAppiah, what it the misunderstanding of
the problem of race?
2. Is race
real? Explain.
3. What is the
author’s idea of equality? Do you disagree or agree? Explain.